Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20253:22-cv-00785California380 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INTEGRITY MEDICAL PRODUCT Case No. 22-cv-00785-BAS-BLM

SOLUTIONS, LLC,

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

Plaintiff, JOINT MOTION (ECF No. 56) v. 14 SEROCLINIX CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 This case arises from a contractual dispute between Plaintiff Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC (“Integrity”) and Defendants Seroclinix Corporation, a Canadian corporation (“Seroclinix Canada”), and Seroclinix Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Seroclinix Delaware”). Before the Court are the parties’ Joint Motion to (1) withdraw Seroclinix Delaware’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 42); (2) allow Plaintiff to file a Fourth Amended Complaint; (3) allow Defendants to file a Third-Party Complaint; and (4) extend the time for Defendants to file an Answer to the Fourth Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 56.) “In general, a court should liberally allow a party to amend its pleading.” Sonoma Cty. Ass’n of Retired Emps. v. Sonoma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.