E.C.D
E.C.D v. San Diego Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 E.C.D. By and Through His Guardian Ad Case No.: 23-cv-303-RSH-MSB Litem, FARAH CHERY,
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF
Plaintiff, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE v. 15 [ECF No. 35]
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff E.C.D., by and through his guardian ad litem, Farah Chery, appeals a November 18, 2022 decision of an administrative law judge (the “ALJ’s Decision”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2)(A). The ALJ’s Decision determined that defendant San Diego Unified School District (the “District”) provided Plaintiff with an individualized education program (“IEP”) that offered a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) in the least restrictive environment. 26 27 AR 1059–60.1 In this appeal, Plaintiff alleges several errors by the ALJ; the District asks this Court to affirm the ALJ’s Decision. The Parties have fully briefed their positions, and the Court finds the matter…