E.C.D
E.C.D v. San Diego Unified School District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 E.C.D. By and Through His Guardian Ad Case No.: 23-cv-303-RSH-MSB Litem, FARAH CHERY, 13
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF
Plaintiff, 14 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE v. 15 [ECF No. 35]
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL
16
DISTRICT,
17 Defendant. 18 19 20 Plaintiff E.C.D., by and through his guardian ad litem, Farah Chery, appeals a 21 November 18, 2022 decision of an administrative law judge (the “ALJ’s Decision”) under 22 the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2)(A). 23 The ALJ’s Decision determined that defendant San Diego Unified School District 24 (the “District”) provided Plaintiff with an individualized education program (“IEP”) that 25 offered a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) in the least restrictive environment. 26 27 1 AR 1059–60.1 In this appeal, Plaintiff alleges several errors by the ALJ; the District asks 2 this Court to affirm the ALJ’s Decision. 3 The Parties have fully briefed their positions, and the Court finds the matter…