Ruth
Ruth v. Lousiana Pacific Paper Pulp Company/Mill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EBER G. RUTH, Case No. 24-cv-06673-TLT
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v. 9
10 LOUSIANA PACIFIC PAPER PULP
COMPANY/MILL,
11 Defendant.
12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed this action. His complaint is now before the 15 Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A. The complaint will be dismissed for 16 failure to state a claim. 17 Plaintiff’s application to proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) will be granted by separate 18 order. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Standard of Review 21 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 22 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims 24 that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek 25 monetary relief from a…