(PC) Valdivia v. Fresno County

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOHN VALDIVIA, Case No. 1:24-CV-00084 JLT EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff,

11 ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS v. FROM PARTIES REGARDING 12 SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY

13 COUNTY OF FRESNO, 14 Defendant. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15 16 17 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) and has ordered the case to 18 proceed. (ECF No. 6). Defendant Fresno County has appeared and filed an Answer. (ECF No. 19 11). In addition, after several phone conversations between parties, Defendant filed a notice 20 stating that while “the parties have had a positive dialogue . . . it is defense counsel’s good faith 21 belief that an early settlement conference would not be productive at this time.” (ECF No. 13). 22 Accordingly, the Court will not set a settlement conference at this time and will proceed to 23 issuing a scheduling order in this case. However, to the extent any claims remain following a 24 ruling on dispositive motions, no…