Russell
Russell v. City of San Diego
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRANCE RUSSELL an individual, Case No.: 24cv0527-GPC(SBC)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT
14 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipality;
LEAVE TO AMEND
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
OFFICER L. FANLO (BADGE #7841),
[Dkt. No. 19.] 16 an individual; DAVID NISLEIT, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18
19 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the remaining Monell1 claims in 20 the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 21 (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants replied. (Dkt. Nos. 21, 22.) 22 The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant 23 to Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS in part 24 and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Monell claims. 25 / / / 26 27 28 1 Background 2 On December 21, 2023,…