Russell

Russell v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20253:24-cv-00527California4,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE RUSSELL an individual, Case No.: 24cv0527-GPC(SBC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipality;

LEAVE TO AMEND

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

OFFICER L. FANLO (BADGE #7841),

[Dkt. No. 19.] an individual; DAVID NISLEIT, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the remaining Monell1 claims in 20 the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 21 (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants replied. (Dkt. Nos. 21, 22.) 22 The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant 23 to Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS in part 24 and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Monell claims. 25 / / / 26 27 28 Background On December 21, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.