Nozot
Nozot v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID NOZOT, Case No.: 24cv1171-DMS(LR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
v. MOTION TO CONTINUE [ECF NO. 19] WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 17 On January 24, 2025, the parties filed a “Joint Moton to Continue the Dates Set in the Court’s Scheduling Order.” (ECF No. 19.) The parties seek to continue the deadline to complete fact discovery by approximately twenty-one days from January 24, 2025, until February 14, 2025. (ECF No. 19-1 at 2–4.) In support, the parties state that they require additional time to complete previously-noticed witness depositions. (Id. at 3.) A scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). This good cause standard “primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment. The district court may modify the pretrial schedule if it cannot reasonably be met despite the…