Dahlin

Dahlin v. Frieborn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20252:17-cv-02585California6,961 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02585-DC-AC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS

FOR RECONSIDERATION, GRANTING IN

14 ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al., PART MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND COSTS, AND DENYING MOTION

15 Defendants. FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 16 (Doc. Nos. 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 217, 225) 17 18 This matter came before the court on December 20, 2024 for a hearing on several 19 motions: (i) Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s October 1, 2024 order (Doc. No. 20 214); (ii) Plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order (Doc. No. 215); (iii) the motions for attorneys’ 21 fees and costs filed by Defendants Rosemary Frieborn, Curt Ransom, and Thomas Sheriff on 22 October 21, 2024 (Doc. Nos. 211, 212, 213, 217); and (iv) Defendants Frieborn’s and Ransom’s 23 unopposed motion for terminating sanctions, in which all other defendants have joined (Doc. Nos. 24 225, 230, 232). Attorney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.