Redeaux

Redeaux v. TVC Funding IV REO, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20253:24-cv-06560California3,084 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARY ANN REDEAUX, Case No. 24-cv-06560-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JUDICIAL

9 v. DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED MOTION

TO DISMISS; AND ORDER TO SHOW

10 TVC FUNDING IV REO, LLC, et al., CAUSE

11 Defendants. Docket No. 29 12

13 14 Plaintiff Mary Ann Redeaux, proceeding pro se, has filed a foreclosure-related suit against 15 (1) TVC Funding IV REO, LLC; (2) several judges on the Alameda Superior Court (Noel Wise, 16 Rebekah Evenson, Sarah Sandford-Smith, and Elizabeth Riles); and (3) the Alameda County 17 Superior Court.1 The defendants listed in (2) and (3) shall collectively be referred to as the 18 “Judicial Defendants.” Now pending before the Court is the Judicial Defendants’ motion to 19 dismiss. Ms. Redeaux failed to file an opposition to the motion. Having considered the papers 20 submitted, the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The motion 21 to dismiss is GRANTED. 22 I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.