Fityan

Fityan v. World Courier, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20253:24-cv-07034California1,468 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABED FITYAN, Case No. 24-cv-07034-AMO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. REMAND

10 WORLD COURIER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants. 11

12 Plaintiff Abed Fityan commenced this employment discrimination action against 13 Defendants World Courier, Inc., Cencora, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, 14 Amerisourcebergen Services Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Specialty Group, LLC, and Rina 15 Savaiinaea in San Mateo Superior Court on August 26, 2024. ECF 1-1 (“Compl.”). Fityan asserts 16 state law claims for (1) disability discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing 17 Act (“FEHA”), (2) disability retaliation in violation of FEHA, (3) failure to provide reasonable 18 accommodations in violation of FEHA, (4) failure to engage in the interactive process in violation 19 of FEHA, (5) violation of the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”), (6) race/national origin 20 discrimination in violation of FEHA, (7) race/national origin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.