Willis

Willis v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20254:22-cv-03427California2,031 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CALVIN WILLIS, Case No. 22-cv-03427-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

9 v. REGARDING EXHAUSTION;

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

10 MATTHEW TAYLOR, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San 14 Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) correctional officer Taylor, alleging that on March 14, 2019, 15 defendant Taylor used excessive force on him, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Dkt. Nos. 16 1, 11. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s request for leave to file a 17 supplemental brief on whether administrative remedies remained available to Plaintiff after he 18 received the January 3, 2020 response to his December 23, 2019 request for a status update; and 19 ORDERS Defendant to file a dispositive motion according to the briefing schedule set forth 20 below. 21 DISCUSSION 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.