Hunter
(PS) Sanders v. Hunter
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS DANE SANDERS, No. 2:23-CV-0293-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHELLE HUNTER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Unruh Act. See ECF No. 1. Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 11. Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the matter was submitted on the papers without oral argument. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for summary judgment or summary adjudication when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). The standard for summary judgment and summary adjudication is the same. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 …