Greenlaw

Greenlaw v. Su

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20255:18-cv-04932California11,457 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ROSEMARY GREENLAW, Case No. 18-cv-04932-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

11 JULIE SU, JUDGMENT 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 119, 120, 121

13 14 Plaintiff Rosemary Greenlaw filed this action against the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”), 15 alleging, among other things, discrimination on the basis of age and disability and retaliation for 16 engaging in protected conduct. See Dkt. Nos. 1, 8. The Secretary now moves for summary 17 judgment. Dkt. Nos. 120, 128. Ms. Greenlaw opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 127. Upon 18 consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the 19 Court grants the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment in part and denies the motion in part. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 A. Factual Background 22 Unless otherwise indicated, the following facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.