Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20255:22-cv-04844California2,025 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

CONSIDER WHETHER

10 ZAZZLE, INC., et al., DEFENDANTS’ MATERIALS SHOULD

BE SEALED AND GRANTING

11 Defendants. DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

12 [Re: ECF 299, 307] 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff” or “Laatz”) Administrative Motion 14 to Consider Whether Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed, filed in connection with her Motion 15 for Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 288). ECF No. 299. 16 Defendants filed a statement in support of sealing the materials identified in Laatz’s motion, ECF 17 No. 308, as well as their own Administrative Motion to Seal those materials, ECF No. 307. Plaintiff 18 did not submit any response to Defendants’ statement in support of sealing …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.