Laatz
Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
9 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER
10 ZAZZLE, INC., et al., DEFENDNATS’ MATERIALS SHOULD
BE SEALED
11 Defendants. [Re: ECF 319] 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff” or “Laatz”) Administrative Motion 13 to Consider Whether Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed, filed in connection with her Motion 14 for Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 311). ECF 319. 15 Defendants filed a statement in support of sealing the materials identified in Laatz’s motion. ECF 16 323. Plaintiff did not submit any response to Defendants’ statement in support of sealing. 17 For the reasons described below, Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether 18 Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed, ECF No. 319, is GRANTED. 19
I. LEGAL STANDARD
20 “Historically, courts have recognized a…