Kittelson

Kittelson v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20253:24-cv-01374California2,110 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

26 On August 2, 2024, Plaintiff Kristy Kittelson (“Kittelson”) filed the instant 27 action against Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“Midland”) asserting 1 “FDCPA”). (Complaint at 1-9). Plaintiff claims that Midland communicated with 2 Plaintiff after notice that Plaintiff was represented by counsel, Midland 3 communicated with Plaintiff after Plaintiff provided a cease and desist from further 4 communications, Midland made a false representation of the name of the creditor to 5 whom the alleged debt was owed, thereby collecting a debt not owed to Midland, and 6 Midland communicated with third-parties without Plaintiff’s prior consent. 7 On January 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of a Clerk’s Default 8 against Midland due to Midland or its counsel’s failure to appear and on January 3, 9 2025, the Clerk of the Court entered a Clerk’s Default against Midland. [ECF Nos. 4, 10 5.] 11 On January 13, 2025, Plaintiff filed a request to file a motion for final default 12 judgment [ECF No. 6], and Defense attorneys Thomas Landers, Esq. and Ethan B. 13 Shakoori, Esq. filed notices of appearance and an ex parte motion to set aside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.