Smiley

Smiley v. PNC Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20253:24-cv-02189California2,250 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALI SMILEY, Case No. 24-cv-2189-MMA-BLM

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

13 v. REMAND

14 PNC BANK, N.A., et al., [Doc. No. 7] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On December 5, 2024, Plaintiff Ali Smiley (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to remand 19 this action to California Superior Court, County of San Diego. Doc. No. 7. Defendant 20 PNC Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) filed a response in opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. 21 Doc. Nos. 9, 12. The Court took this matter under submission on January 17, 2025, 22 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Doc. 23 No. 13. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to remand. 24 I. BACKGROUND1 25 Defendant, a corporate entity, employed Plaintiff, an individual, since on or around 26 June 1, 2021, when it completed acquisition of Plaintiff’s previous employer. Doc. No. 27

28 1 1-2 (“Compl.”) ¶¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.