(PC) Hammler v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20252:23-cv-02778California898 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 2:23-cv-2778-DAD-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On October 16, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it did 18 not state a claim. The court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 19 7. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint or otherwise to respond to the court order. 20 Therefore, on December 4, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 21 dismissed for his failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a 22 claim. ECF No. 8. I notified plaintiff that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file 23 an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the December 4, 2024 24 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline for 25 plaintiff to file an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.