(PC) Christensen v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-2088-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On November 8, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it did 19 not state a claim. The court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 20 5. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint or otherwise to respond to the court order. 21 Therefore, on December 19, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 22 dismissed for his failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a 23 claim. ECF No. 7. I notified plaintiff that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file 24 an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the December 19, 2024 25 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline for 26 plaintiff to…