Emsurgcare

Emsurgcare v. United Healthcare Insurance Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:24-cv-07837California3,574 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 JS-6 2 3

4

5

6

7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 Emsurgcare and Emergency Surgical Case No.: 2:24-cv-07837-CBM-E Assistant, 12 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND;

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

14 UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. and

DISMISS

DOES 1-10,

15 Defendants. 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The matters before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and 2 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or 3 Alternatively, to Compel Arbitration. (Dkt. Nos. 15, 16.) 4 I. BACKGROUND 5 This is a quantum meruit acion filed on April 17, 2024 in state court by 6 Plaintiffs Emsurgcare and Emergency Surgical Assistant (collectively, 7 “Emsurgcare”) against Defendant Pacific Premier Bank. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) Plaintiffs 8 later filed an amended complaint in state court removing Pacific Premier Bank and 9 naming United Healthcare Insurance Co. (“United”) as a defendant. (See Dkt. No. 10 7-1 at 13 (“FAC”).) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.