Emsurgcare
Emsurgcare v. United Healthcare Insurance Co.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 JS-6 2 3
4
5
6
7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 Emsurgcare and Emergency Surgical Case No.: 2:24-cv-07837-CBM-E Assistant, 12 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND;
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
14 UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. and
DISMISS
DOES 1-10,
15 Defendants. 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The matters before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and 2 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or 3 Alternatively, to Compel Arbitration. (Dkt. Nos. 15, 16.) 4 I. BACKGROUND 5 This is a quantum meruit acion filed on April 17, 2024 in state court by 6 Plaintiffs Emsurgcare and Emergency Surgical Assistant (collectively, 7 “Emsurgcare”) against Defendant Pacific Premier Bank. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) Plaintiffs 8 later filed an amended complaint in state court removing Pacific Premier Bank and 9 naming United Healthcare Insurance Co. (“United”) as a defendant. (See Dkt. No. 10 7-1 at 13 (“FAC”).) …