Emsurgcare
Emsurgcare v. United Healthcare Insurance Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 2
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Emsurgcare and Emergency Surgical Case No.: 2:24-cv-07837-CBM-E Assistant, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, v. MOTION TO REMAND;
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. and
DISMISS
DOES 1-10,
15 Defendants.
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The matters before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or Alternatively, to Compel Arbitration. (Dkt. Nos. 15, 16.) I. BACKGROUND This is a quantum meruit acion filed on April 17, 2024 in state court by Plaintiffs Emsurgcare and Emergency Surgical Assistant (collectively, “Emsurgcare”) against Defendant Pacific Premier Bank. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) Plaintiffs later filed an amended complaint in state court removing Pacific Premier Bank and naming United Healthcare Insurance Co. (“United”) as a defendant. (See Dkt. No. 7-1 at 13 (“FAC”).) …