(PS) Lucero v. Oak Run Elementary School District

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOLORES LUCERO, Case No. 2:24-CV-02854-DC-SCR 12 13 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS 14 v. 15 16 OAK RUN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 17 DISTRICT, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Presently before the Court are two motions for permission to e-file documents, filed by 22 Plaintiff Dolores Lucero, who proceeds without the assistance of counsel.1 ECF Nos. 18 & 26. 23 Plaintiff’s first motion states that allowing e-filing will promote judicial efficiency and states she 24 has the ability to utilize the CM/ECF system. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff’s second motion, filed less 25 than one month after the first, states that Plaintiff has been unable to timely respond to some of 26 Defendants’ filings, although no specific examples are given. ECF No. 26. Defendants have not 27 1 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 28 and Local Rule 302(c)(21). 1 opposed the motions. 2 The Court observes that Plaintiff has experienced no apparent difficulty filing. Since 3 …