(PC) Louprasong v. San Joaquin County Jail Recreational

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMPHONE LOUPRASONG, Case No. 2:24-cv-3416-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL

RECREATIONAL,

15 Defendant. 16

17 18 19 On December 19, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to explain, within twenty-one days, why he 20 should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis despite his trust fund account statement showing 21 an available balance of $1,496. ECF No. 4. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. 22 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. 23 The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court 24 orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council 25 v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 26 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to 27 28 1 | administer justice expeditiously and avoid…