(PC) Louprasong v. San Joaquin County Jail Recreational

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMPHONE LOUPRASONG, Case No. 2:24-cv-3416-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL

RECREATIONAL,

15 Defendant.

17 18 On December 19, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to explain, within twenty-one days, why he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis despite his trust fund account statement showing an available balance of $1,496. ECF No. 4. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to 27 28 administer justice expeditiously and avoid…