Yeffri Ulloa v. Blackstone Consulting, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20255:24-cv-01134California5,392 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YEFFRI ULLOA, Case No.: 5:24-cv-01134-HDV-SKx 12

ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’

13 Plaintiff,

MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO

14 RULE 12(B)(6) [DKT. NO. 13]; AND (2)

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

15 v. REMAND [DKT. NO. 15] 16 BLACKSTONE CONSULTING, INC. et al., 17

18 Defendants. 19

20

21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 This putative class action arises from Plaintiff Yeffri Ulloa’s employment as a security guard 3 with Defendants Blackstone Consulting Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospital (“Defendants”). 4 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed to pay him (and the class) for overtime, meal breaks, and rest 5 periods as required by California wage and hour laws. 6 Before the Court are two motions: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. 7 Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. Defendants contend in the main 8 that all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.