Necochea

(PC) Rios v. Necochea

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20251:24-cv-00480California1,492 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOSE MIGUEL RIOS, No. 1:24-cv-00480-JLT-SAB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DEFENDANT’S

10 v. REQUEST TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF

DEFAULT AND REQUEST FOR

11 MOYA, et al., EXTENSION OF TIME BE GRANTED

12 Defendants. (ECF No. 25) 13 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 15

U.S.C. § 1983.

16 Currently before the Court is Defendant’s request to set aside entry of default and 17 extension of time to respond to the operative complaint, filed December 23, 2024. (ECF No. 25.) 18 Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the time to do has now passed. Local Rule 230(l). 19 I. 20

LEGAL STANDARD

21 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c), “[t]he court may set aside an entry of default 22 for good cause....” “To determine ‘good cause’, a court must ‘consider[ ] three factors: (1) 23 whether [the party seeking to set aside the default] engaged in culpable conduct that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.