Petras

(PC) Martin v. Petras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20252:20-cv-01536California2,727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 O.Z. MARTIN, No. 2:20-cv-1536 WBS CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DR. PETRAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on claim 1 in plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF No. 15). In that claim, plaintiff asserts defendants, Doctors Liu, Petras and Ota, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by being deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs. Dr. Liu is employed at San Joaquin General Hospital. Dr. Petras and Dr. Ota are employed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) at the California Medical Facility (CMF). All three defendants have filed motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 91 and 92). I. Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is appropriate when it is demonstrated that there “is no genuine dispute as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.