Milligan

(PC) McCoy v. Milligan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20252:23-cv-00700California1,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME ELI MCCOY, No. 2:23-cv-0700-DC-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MILLIGAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 24) and plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 23, 20) are before the court. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to compel is granted and plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel are denied without prejudice. I. Background Plaintiff proceeds on a deliberate indifference claim against defendant Jeremy Kastl, who was allegedly the Kitchen Supervisor at the Sacramento County Jail. In the operative first amended complaint (ECF No. 10), plaintiff alleges defendant ignored plaintiff’s stomach pains, diarrhea, and allergic reactions caused by eating beans and intentionally served plaintiff beans despite his documented food allergy. As a result, plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.