Milligan

(PC) McCoy v. Milligan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20252:23-cv-00700California1,887 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME ELI MCCOY, No. 2:23-cv-0700-DC-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MILLIGAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 24) and plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of 19 counsel (ECF Nos. 23, 20) are before the court. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s 20 motion to compel is granted and plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel are denied 21 without prejudice. 22 I. Background 23 Plaintiff proceeds on a deliberate indifference claim against defendant Jeremy Kastl, who 24 was allegedly the Kitchen Supervisor at the Sacramento County Jail. In the operative first 25 amended complaint (ECF No. 10), plaintiff alleges defendant ignored plaintiff’s stomach pains, 26 diarrhea, and allergic reactions caused by eating beans and intentionally served plaintiff beans 27 despite his documented food allergy. As a result, plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.