Grubb

(PS) Whitsitt v. Grubb

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20252:23-cv-00869California539 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:23-cv-0869-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPUTY GRUBB; SAN JOAQUIN

15 COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT;

DAVES TOWING; RONNIE ESTRADA;

16 and DOES 1-100, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was accordingly referred to the 20 undersigned for pretrial matters pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed the complaint 21 in this matter on May 10, 2023, a First Amended Complaint on March 11, 2024, and a Second 22 Amended Complaint on September 6, 2024. ECF Nos. 1, 9, 22. 23 On December 13, 2024, the Court issued an order setting a pretrial scheduling conference 24 for January 23, 2025. ECF No. 26. The Court’s order also required the parties to file status 25 reports at least 14 days prior to the pretrial scheduling conference. Id. While Defendants filed a 26 timely status report in advance of the pretrial scheduling conference,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.