(PS) Devi v. Sacramento Bhartiya Sabha

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINEETA DEVI, No. 2:24-cv-00689-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO BHARTIYA SABHA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17

18 Plaintiff Vineeta Devi paid the filing fee and filed this civil action without counsel. This 19 matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 Presently before the Court is defendant City of Sacramento’s (“City”) motion to dismiss 21 plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 4), and defendant Sacramento Bhartiya Sabha Church 22 Corporation’s1 (“Church”) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 8). The Court took 23 the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 16.) 24 For the reasons set forth below, the complaint fails to state a claim against the moving defendants. 25 The defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 4, 8) are GRANTED, and the claims against them 26 27 1 The Church defendant was erroneously sued as “Sacramento Bhartiya Saha (dba) Shree Laxmi 28 …