(PS) Creel v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD MICHAEL CREEL, No. 2:24-cv-01533-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, and accordingly this matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) which was granted. ECF No. 5. On November 5, 2024, the Court issued an Order screening the original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Order advised Plaintiff of the deficiencies with the complaint, and allowed him 30 days to file an amended complaint. On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 6. The Court now screens the FAC, and for the reasons provided below, the Court finds Plaintiff’s FAC is legally deficient and will grant Plaintiff a second opportunity to file an amended complaint. //// //// I. …