(SS) Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20252:24-cv-02351California417 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMUEL JOSEPH ORTIZ, No. 2:24-cv-02351-DC-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’

STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES

SECURITY, UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE

15 ACT Defendant. 16 (Doc. No. 19)

17 18 On August 28, 2024, Plaintiff Samuel Joseph Ortiz filed this action seeking review of a 19 final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. No. 1.) On January 10, 2025, 20 the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant 21 to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 17.) On January 17, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation with the 22 court in which the parties agree that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees and expenses under 23 the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $5,679.86, and 24 no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.