(PS) Biggins v. Winn Companies LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARNAE BIGGINS, No. 2:24-cv-02736-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WINN COMPANIES, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Charnae Biggins (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On December 11, 2024 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo…