Madrigal

Madrigal v. Raincross Pub and Restaurant CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2025D083413California6,752 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 1/28/25 Madrigal v. Raincross Pub and Restaurant CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW MADRIGAL, D083413

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. RIC2002182)

RAINCROSS PUB AND

RESTAURANT,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Irma Poole Asberry, Judge. Reversed. McCune Law Group, Brynna D. Popka, Cory R. Weck, Steven A. Haskins and Andrew W. Van Ligten for Plaintiff and Appellant. Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, Keith E. Smith and Steven R. Disharoon for Defendant and Respondent. Matthew Madrigal appeals a summary judgment entered against him in his lawsuit against Raincross Pub and Restaurant, LLC., et al., formerly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.