Vivek Shah v. Blueground US, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202523-55799California245 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIVEK SHAH, No. 23-55799

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-03914-GW-AGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BLUEGROUND US, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Vivek Shah appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

diversity action alleging discrimination under state law on the basis of his criminal

record. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua

sponte dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d 1082, 1086…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.