United States v. Johnson
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3676 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:09-cr-05703-DGE-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANTOINE DOUGLASS JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David G. Estudillo, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2025**
Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Antoine Douglass Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s orders
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his motions seeking relief
from that order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de
novo, United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir. 2007), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We agree with the district court…