Boucher

United States v. Boucher

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202524-3674California243 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3674 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-02872-BAS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARK J. BOUCHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Mark J. Boucher appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for wire fraud

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

Boucher’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant has

not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.