Stebbins
Stebbins v. Doe
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, No. 24-4992 D.C. No. 4:24-mc-80179-HSG Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
JOHN DOE, DBA Creetosis; YOUTUBE,
LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2025**
Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
David Anthony Stebbins appeals pro se from the district court’s order
barring the filing of his complaint pursuant to a vexatious litigant pre-filing review
order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s determination that a complaint fails to state…