James Green v. Romeo Aranas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202522-16926California359 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES HENRY GREEN, No. 22-16926

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-00245-RCJ-CSD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROMEO ARANAS; RENE BAKER;

JAMES COX; MICHAEL KOEHN; JON

GARDNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner James Henry Green appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs and retaliation. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s ruling on cross-

motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.