Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Bluechip Services

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202523-55740California448 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, No. 23-55740

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00900-AGS-KSC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BLUECHIP SERVICES, (International), An India Private Limited Company; BLUECHIP

SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CHENNAI,

An India Private Limited Company;

MOHAMMED HARISS; MUBEEN TAJ;

HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A

Utah LLC; CHRIS HOWELL; JUSTIN

SPENCER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Andrew G. Schopler, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Aparna Vashisht-Rota appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing her diversity action alleging various…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.