People v. Holmes CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In August 2022, defendant entered a no contest plea to a felony charge of
vandalism. (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (b)(1); all further statutory references are to this
code.) His negotiated disposition included a sentence of two years on felony probation,
with credit for time served. As the factual basis for his plea, defendant stipulated to the
police report concerning his arrest, which reflected that he was apprehended under the La
Cadena bridge in Colton, holding a saw in his hand. Defendant admitted at the scene that
he had been offered $200 by someone named “Milo” to “see if there was copper wire in
the utility line” he had just severed. The line belonged to and was maintained by the
telecommunications company, AT&T, which had to respond to the incident to restore
service to its customers.
2 Defendant’s plea and probation terms both expressly included victim restitution.
An initial estimate prepared by the probation department put AT&T’s damages at more
than $20,000, consisting of $16,550 to “Replace and repair copper” and $5,707.20 to
“Replace and repair fiber.” The restitution hearing was continued several times.