Hart

Hart v. Rushmore Loan Management Services CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2025B333200California1,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 1/28/25 Hart v. Rushmore Loan Management Services CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

GUY HART, B333200

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21SMCV01658 v.

RUSHMORE LOAN

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark H. Epstein, Judge. Affirmed. Shapero Law Firm and Sarah Shapero for Plaintiff and Appellant. Houser and Neil J. Cooper for Defendants and Respondents. Guy Hart appeals the trial court’s order granting a motion for summary judgment by Rushmore Loan Management Services, Inc. (now known as Nationstar Mortgage, Inc.)and Athene Annuity and Life Insurance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.