Tyshaun Andrew Jackson v. Warren L. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20252:20-cv-04461California266 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case 2:20-cv-04461-MCS (GJS) Date January 28, 2025 No. Title Tyshaun Andrew Jackson v. Warren L. Montgomery

Present: Hon. Gail J. Standish, United States Magistrate Judge N. Estrada N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Rhines Stay Should Not Be Vacated

On June 18, 2020, at Petitioner’s request, the Court issued an Order granting a Rhines1 stay in this case [Dkt. 7, “Stay Order”]. The Stay Order provided that, “[w]ithin 45 days of this Order and every 60 days thereafter, Petitioner must file a brief Status Report, in which he advises the Court of the status of his state habeas proceeding(s).” The Stay Order also provided that “Petitioner is cautioned that the failure to comply with these requirements may result in the Court ordering the stay to be vacated nunc pro tunc.”

It is now 125 days since Petitioner – who is represented by counsel – filed his last Status Report. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.