Fernandez
Fernandez v. Duarte
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK J. FERNANDEZ, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00446-BAS-VET
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO FILE PRIVILEGE LOG
13 v. AND LODGE DOCUMENTS FOR IN
CAMERA REVIEW
14 E. DUARTE, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Frank Fernandez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel 19 Discovery. Doc. No. 81 (“Motion”). Defendant E. Duarte (“Defendant”) timely opposed 20 the Motion. Doc. No. 83 (“Opposition”). Defendant invokes the official information 21 privilege in the Opposition, having withheld materials that are otherwise responsive to 22 many of Plaintiff’s requests for production. Id. at 14–16. Centinela State Prison Litigation 23 Coordinator N. Telles (“Declarant Telles”) filed a supporting declaration, representing that 24 he or she has reviewed or is familiar with material responsive to Plaintiff’s relevant 25 requests for production. Id. at 67. Declarant Telles further represents that producing certain 26 responsive documents, such as Defendant’s personnel…