Fernandez

Fernandez v. Duarte

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20253:22-cv-00446California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK J. FERNANDEZ, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00446-BAS-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO FILE PRIVILEGE LOG

v. AND LODGE DOCUMENTS FOR IN

CAMERA REVIEW

E. DUARTE, Defendant. 15 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Frank Fernandez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Discovery. Doc. No. 81 (“Motion”). Defendant E. Duarte (“Defendant”) timely opposed the Motion. Doc. No. (“Opposition”). Defendant invokes the official information privilege in the Opposition, having withheld materials that are otherwise responsive to many of Plaintiff’s requests for production. Id. at 14–16. Centinela State Prison Litigation Coordinator N. Telles (“Declarant Telles”) filed a supporting declaration, representing that he or she has reviewed or is familiar with material responsive to Plaintiff’s relevant requests for production. Id. at 67. Declarant Telles further represents that producing certain responsive documents, such as Defendant’s personnel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.