Hamerslag

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Hamerslag

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20253:23-cv-00780California1,409 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE Case No.: 23-CV-780 JLS (AHG)

COMPANY,

12

ORDER (1) DENYING JOINT

Plaintiff, 13 MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFF v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE 14

COMPANY’S REQUEST FOR

STEVEN HAMERSLAG; and 15 JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND (2) SUA

PERSPECTIUM CORP.,

SPONTE STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

16 Defendants. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 17 (ECF No. 40-2) 18 (ECF Nos. 40-2, 42) 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company and Defendant 21 Steven Hamerslag’s Joint Motion to Seal Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company’s 22 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Joint 23 Mot.,” ECF No. 42). Having carefully considered the Parties’ Joint Motion, the relevant 24 filings, and the law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Joint Motion and 25 sua sponte STRIKES Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 40-2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.