St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20251:20-cv-00967California1,100 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ST PAUL FIRE AND MARINE Case No. 1:20-cv-00967-CDB INSURANCE COMPANY and NEW 9 YORK MARINE AND GENERAL ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

INSURANCE COMPANY, REQUEST TO AMEND SCHEDULING

10 ORDER AS MODIFIED Plaintiffs, 11 (Doc. 101) v. 12

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

13 Defendant, 14

TRC OPERATING COMPANY, INC.

15 and TRC CYPRESS GROUP, LLC.,

16 Real Parties in Interest. 17 18 Background 19 On December 23, 2024, the parties filed a jointly executed stipulated request to continue 20 by approximately 90 days all case management dates – including the expired deadline to 21 complete alternative dispute resolution/mediation. (Doc. 99). The parties proffered that good 22 cause existed for the extension in part because new counsel for Plaintiff St. Paul Fire and Marine 23 Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) substituted into the case on October 24, 2024, and “is in the 24 process of becoming familiar with the more than four years of litigation associated with this 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.