McEnery

McEnery v. McEnery

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20254:21-cv-09614California3,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN P. MCENERY, Case No. 21-cv-09614-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD

v. Re: Dkt. No. 62 TOM MCENERY, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is the motion to confirm arbitration award filed by Defendants Tom McEnery, Martin Menne, and MCM Diversified. Dkt. No. 62. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to confirm the arbitration award. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the lengthy history of this case, and the Court only includes those details that are relevant to the pending motion. Plaintiff John McEnery and Defendants hold ownership interests in Urban Markets, LLC (“UM”) and Urban Markets Entertainment, LLC (“UME”) (collectively, “the LLCs”). See Dkt. No. 62-11, Ex. 12 (“Corrected Final Award”) at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.