Ford

Ford v. Isagenix International, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20253:24-cv-02334California165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

l 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || EMILY FORD, Case No.: 24-cv-2334-RSH-VET Plants ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR 13 || ORDER OF DISMISSAL 14 || ISAGENIX INTERNATIONAL LLC, [ECF Nos. 25, 27] Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is the Parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal.” ECF Nos. 25, 27. The 19 || stipulation satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)() and is effective on filing. 20 || Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its entirety, is ||hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each Party is to bear its own fees and costs. ||The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary 23 || Restraining Order [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 28, 2025 fekut C [bonne 26 Hon. Robert S. Huie United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.