Pfeiffer

(PC) Thomas v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20251:23-cv-01232California637 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL THOMAS, No. 1:23-cv-01232-SAB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR CLARIFICATION OF LAW AND

10 v. JUDICIAL NOTICE 11 PALOMINO, (ECF No. 31) 12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action 15 proceeds on Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Palomino. 16 On December 16, 2024, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to 17 exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 26.) On January 6, 2025, Defendant filed a 18 motion to stay all merits-based discovery, which was granted on January 7, 2025. (ECF Nos. 27, 19 28.) 20 On January 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary 21 judgment, and Defendant filed a reply on January 24, 2025. (ECF Nos. 29, 30.) 22 On January 27, 2025, Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s stay of 23 merits-based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.