Miramontes-Peraza

Miramontes-Peraza v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20253:25-cv-00070California555 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISAAC NATANAEL MIRAMONTES- Case No.: 25cv70-CAB-SBC

PERAZA,

12

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

Petitioner, 13 v. 14 MICHAEL A. HERNANDEZ, et al, 15 Respondents. 16

17 On January 13, 2025, Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 Section 2241. [Doc. No. 1.] Petitioner is currently a defendant in an ongoing criminal 19 proceeding in this Court before a different district court judge. See generally, 24cr1822- 20 AGS. In that criminal proceeding, Petitioner is currently out on bond. [24cr1822, Doc. 21 Nos. 30, 33.] Petitioner has also been allowed, at his request, to represent himself in the 22 criminal proceedings. [24cr1822, Doc. No. 33.] In this petition, while there is some 23 mention of conditions of confinement (which are now moot), Petitioner primarily 24 addresses the merits of the criminal case, and voices frustration with his attorney and the 25 trial court’s rulings. [Doc. No. 1 at 28-35.] 26 It is well established that a criminal defendant cannot use a petition for writ of 27 habeas corpus to challenge the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.