Cosmonova, LLC v. Biofilm, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 COSMONOVA, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-1453-MMA-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
BIOFILM, INC., et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 19] 18 19 20 21 22 On December 9, 2024, Defendants BioFilm, Inc. and Combe, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Cosmonova, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) amended complaint. Doc No. 19. Per the Court’s special briefing schedule, Doc. No. 18, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition on December 23, 2024, to which Defendants replied on January 17, 2025. Doc. Nos. 20, 21. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 18. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion. I.…