(SS) Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20251:24-cv-00504California4,769 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JACOB DAVID LAMAR, Case No. 1:24-cv-00504-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

12 v.

SECURITY COMPLAINT

13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 14, 16).

SECURITY,

14

Defendant. 15

16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jacob David Lamar’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint 17 for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security 18 Administration regarding his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental 19 security income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States 20 Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of 21 Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 10). 22 Plaintiff raises the following issues: 23 A. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by failing to adopt or explain the 24 rejection of Dr. Mair’s opined limitations, despite finding her opinion persuasive. 25 B. The residual functional capacity (“RFC”) assessment is not supported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.