Wendy Winslow v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20258:24-cv-02300California4,292 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 WENDY WINSLOW, an Individual, Case No.: 8:24-cv-02300-JWH-JDE

12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14

TARGET CORPORATION,

15 VELOCITY PHARMA LLC,

KILITCH HEALTHCARE INDIA

16 LIMITED, and DOES 1-20, inclusive,

17 Defendants.

18 19 Based on the parties’ Stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court finds 20 and orders as follows. 21 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 22 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 23 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 24 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be 25 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 26 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 27 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 1 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.